Letters from Uniform Girls 14

Dear Sirs,

I have noticed a tendency in your magazines, in particular Uniform Girls, to single out nurses as potential victims of corporal punishment. I think this is morally deplorable. Nurses in this country are shamefully exploited and overworked as a result of spending cuts in the Health Service. Their pay is little more than pitiful and can hardly be said to reflect any appreciation of the dedication expected of them — yet they work on with remarkable goodwill. It hardly seems right that their unselfish efforts to relieve the pain and suffering of others should be rewarded by articles and photographs that invite us to delight in the infliction of pain and suffering on nurses.

However, they make very effective wanking fodder, so, morally deplorable as it is, I hope you will continue to exploit them and encourage us to use nurses as targets for our fantasies.

Can I make a submission to your By Request feature? Can we have a nurse in blue-striped uniform and cap, all the accessories (scissors, belt, nurse’s watch etc), without stockings and suspenders, being made to suffer indignities? None of the nurses I have undressed have worn stockings, so as you have catered for the lingerie brigade in all your previous nursing features, can I have plain cotton knickers? And sensible shoes are of course the only ones appropriate. By preference I’d like your most heavily-bottomed model.

I’d like a series of pictures in which it is suggested that she is deliberately being made to look ridiculous by a number of men. Why not stick her up in a tree like the nun a while back? I would especially like to see her obliged to partake in activities which leave her uniform thoroughly messed-up. Perhaps she could be sent on an assault course, finally ending up in a muddy pool, bedraggled and pathetic. I also enjoyed a letter in one of your magazines describing a ballet dancer being pelted with fruit and covered in baked-beans. I always enjoy slapstick involving girls (provided they don’t have silly smiles on their faces) and I’d love to see a nurse being splattered with messy food.

A student of physiology, Cambridge

Oh, well — maybe we can do something for you Mr Cambridge. Perhaps the Uniform magazine after next.

A LATE DEVELOPER

Dear Sirs,

Your magazines are going from strength to strength! Congratulations on the larger, improved, Uniform Girls. I presume that the thinner magazines are going to be phased out now, and personally I welcome that as I couldn’t keep up with the frequency of publication of your four mags — neither could my bank balance — and I had to miss a lot of goodies. Now I should be able to buy every issue.

I was late to cotton on to Uniform Girls as I had assumed from the title that it was to be a fetish magazine. What a pleasant surprise to find it full of punishment and humiliation for girls! You do such a professional job on them by comparison with other magazines, and may I thank you on behalf of your countless delighted readers for the attention you pay to our requests. We asked for more humiliation and you’ve not let us down. I can remember a few years ago a rival magazine addressing itself to the question of humiliation in the following terms: ‘We do not believe that humiliation should form part of any punishment for girls. The effects of a spanking or caning soon fade and are forgotten, whereas humiliation can often lead to considerable resentment!’ And this was a statement of editorial policy! Never mind what it does to the girls, the right treatment produced a rock-hard erection in seconds and you can’t argue with a stiff cock. Indeed, is there any more sensual pleasure than that of carefully crushing the self-confidence of a self-opinionated young woman?

I think you could almost claim to have started a whole new genre of magazines in response to our requests, for you have gone beyond mere spanking to explore the countless ways in which vulnerable girls can be exploited and made to suffer for our sexual entertainment. A letter some time ago proposed the idea of a reluctant performer and went on to describe a delicious scene in which a ballet student was forced to dance in front of an abusive male audience. You responded with the wonderful Reluctant Majorette in Uniform Girls — a breathtaking piece of fiction with some equally enticing photographs. I loved the insistence by Babs’ guardian that she should keep a forced smile on her face while going through her routines, even though she was crying her eyes out. I do regret that this didn’t come out in the pictures. However, full marks for the final photographic sequence where Babs is made to perform on that grimy, sordid lavatory! Why not make her use the lavatory brush as a baton?

Another photo sequence I enjoyed was of the big-breasted girl being ducked in her bath [Bathtime]. The idea of the story was good, but it is a pity that it had such a soft ending. Let’s have more stories in which girls’ phobias are exploited. I thought the pictures at the end when she was very bedraggled were smashing.

I’d also like to say how much the series Actually Spanked was appreciated. Good of you to publish a full-page facial portrait of Debbie in the last sequence. The policy you should be adopting in my opinion is to guarantee anonymity to the advocates and perpetrators of CP, while giving the maximum publicity to the victims. I’m pleased to say that this seems to be your approach.

More than one correspondent has asked for readers to send in photos of girls for you to publish — I do hope they will. One thing I would like you to do would be to send your most convincing models out into the street. You’ve done some al fresco work, but so far nothing with the public looking on. The girls could be encouraged to bend over to tie laces in a crowded street, while you catch the expressions of the men eying them up and the middle-aged harridans looking on with disapproval. Have them climb a wall with lots of knicker-showing to all and sundry:- how about a very subdued girl carrying a paper-wrapped cane along Oxford Street while some grim-visaged gentleman walks sternly behind her.

And may I request a little more racial variety, especially West Indian and Asian girls — both ethnic groups can be seen sporting remarkable bottoms beneath their skirts in our cities. I long to see them unveiled.

Lastly, my choice of a celebrity for punishment. It would be the 1984 ‘Young Musician of the Year’ Emma someone-or-other. 19-year-old Emma would be told that she is to give a recital in front of an invited audience. I would greet her at the hall before the concert and show her to her dressing room. After much careful preening she would emerge in a long, elegant, purple velvet dress. Just before the recital is due to start I tell her that there are a couple of gentlemen who wish to have a word with her. They draw her aside, and although I can’t hear their conversation I know that basically they will be telling Emma that if she does what she is told it may be unpleasant for her — but if she refuses it will be even worse.

Emma Johnson

Eventually a very shaken Emma comes back to the stage entrance. It’s time for the fun to begin. The curtains open and I literally push the trembling girl onto the stage. Her accompanist shakes her hand and the applause gives way to an expectant hush.

The introduction is sounded and Emma begins to play — though her breath control in particular leaves much to be desired as she is so nervous. However, nothing happens until the difficult first movement is over.

Then a voice is heard hissing from the wings. Emma shakes her head in disbelief, then reluctantly puts down her clarinet and reaches both hands behind her neck. Applause breaks out as Emma removes her beautiful gown. It lies in a purple pool beside her as, no longer the elegant lady, she picks up the clarinet and nods to the accompanist to resume. In plain Marks and Spencer bra and pants she plays the next movement.

The male audience is now restless, but they are rewarded at the next break when, in response to off-stage commands, Emma unclips the bra and slips it off, to lie on top of the dress. Her tits are not over-large, but young and perky. She covers them with a forearm until she has retrieved her clarinet, then the concert continues with Emma adopting a rather cramped posture intended to hide her nipples.

However, after a few bars the pianist stops and Emma again glances into the wings. ‘No, no,’ she whines, walking towards her tormentors in an appeal for mercy. She is soon driven back. Yes, the pants are coming down, and there is a bushy tangle which really gets the music lovers going. Emma is now weeping and her playing is appalling, breaking down in splutters as she tries to continue. All eyes are on her pubic hair. Once again the pianist stops playing and this time drags his stool into the centre of the stage. Emma is commanded to kneel on it. This she does, facing the audience with a forearm across her breasts and the other hand fanned to cover her pussy. However, she is told to turn around and face the rear of the stage.

Slowly, tearfully, she complies and a hand sneaking back to hide her bottom-crack is slapped away. Emma’s chubby bare bottom is greeted enthusiastically by the audience, but an even bigger cheer goes up when the accompanist produces a birch which has been soaking in a bucket of brine behind the piano.

At the sight of this Emma tries to escape, but she is immediately restrained and held over the stool while the pianist birches her. Screams echo round the hall in counterpoint with the swish of the rod and the SWACK of the twigs against pneumatic girl-flesh. The audience watches entranced as the tender young bottom goes from white to red, flecked with purple ‘ticks’ left by the birch-buds.

When Emma has been thoroughly birched, her accompanist produces a pot of vaseline from his pocket. Emma squeals gaspingly as it is rubbed into her throbbing bottom, then a dab is rubbed into each blushing nipple.

The final humiliation for Emma is when she is required to complete her recital naked, with burning, scalding tears running down her face, while she steadily rotates to give the audience good views of her tits and pussy and flaming bottom. When she takes her bows it is to the rear of the stage so the crowd can jeer at her throbbing bare bum!

Yours faithfully,

P.R. (Huntingdon)

Thank you for this most interesting letter, P.R., and thank you too for those other, equally interesting paragraphs which discretion obliges us to leave out.

POLLSTER’S DELIGHT

Greetings!

This is P.L., he of the famous questionnaire in Whispers 4. I felt I had to write to thank your wonderful readers for their magnificent response. Indeed, I’m truly sorry that I wasn’t able to reply earlier, but I have unfortunately been in a Blushes-free zone for the past few months.

I’m delighted and encouraged to see so many of your readers taking such a tough line with girls. Several readers asked me to describe my own ideas more fully, and I feel it is the least I can do. In response to Question 1, I can hardly better earlier correspondents, though I would like to make a special plea for severity regarding improper dress in a public place. It is regrettable that we have no effective laws against this sort of crime — anyone who has wandered through central London on a hot day knows how girls like to flaunt their bodies these days. They wouldn’t get away with it in some African countries, I can assure you. Where there is a strong Muslim heritage there are often strict regulations regarding female dress. Furthermore, when there is a military takeover, as periodically occurs in parts of West Africa, the soldiers often take it into their own hands to beat girls whose skirts are thought to be too short — even though there are no laws as such on the matter! Good for them, I say.

Question 2: The use of corporal punishment should be restricted to males; college principals, for example, laying down limits from which they themselves are exempt. Thus, providing they do not exceed the maximum number of strokes on one girl by one responsible man in one day, the lecturers can whack away to their hearts’ content without fear of disapproval.

Question 3: ‘Appropriate’ punishment for all these offences would depend largely on my feelings towards the girl concerned. If she was very good-looking, or a girl I’d been itching to get my hands on for some time, she could well find herself being awarded a dozen with the cane on her bare bottom for dropping a pencil or yawning.

Question 4: As the above will make clear, I am far more interested in her physical attributes than the nature of the offence. Ideally a girl should be made to accept the authority of the male establishment regardless of whether her treatment tallies with her own ideas of ‘fairness’. Other’s objections to corporal punishment should be ignored — they are wrong in their opinions and we are right. By all means whip a girl if she deserves it!

Question 5: There is an appropriate punishment for every part of a girl’s body, though the bottom and thighs will always be favourite. As many readers have pointed out, there is a whole world of ways in which to deal with big breasts. I was also much amused by a report in one of your earlier issues about a reform school where laxatives were given as a punishment. In general, I’d suggest hands, bottom (bare if desired) and thighs for punishment, although circumstances could alter this.

Question 6: Corporal punishment should be the normal punishment for all offences committed by girls.

Question 7: Punishments should be recorded and the records made available to the public. Libraries should carry records of every punishment carried out on a girl, with a facial photograph alongside details of the punishment and her reaction to it. Some might like to go further and photograph the girl’s bottom before and after punishment. Local papers should carry the names of all girls punished each week.

Question 8: a) Colleges etc should be issued with canes and tawses. Principals would have in addition birches. b) Penal institutions could use whichever implements they wished — indeed, there should be constant research into developing more efficient devices for punishing girls in prison. c) Private citizens in charge of girls who are old enough would be able to buy straps, canes and paddles on the open market. d) The police would have canes and birches waiting for female offenders at every police station.

Question 9: Humiliation is a very desirable part of the discipline of girls! Indeed while present conditions prevail and those responsible are prevented from giving adequately painful punishments it must be the only way they can really get through to the girls. Humiliation can make the difference between a temporarily painful bottom and a searing trauma of truly reformatory effectiveness! I must thank K.V. Roberts for his tale of eighteen-year-old Ruth whose tawsing was taped and played back to visitors while she was in the room. I do so agree with Roger S of Hounslow that girls’ demands for privacy should be ignored. It is a very good idea to discuss their bodies while others are present and guests should be encouraged to find fault.

Question 10: I was initially disappointed by the response to this question; the idea was to encourage your readers to focus their malicious minds on genuine unsuspecting young ladies of their acquaintance. We all dream of beating the bottoms of girls we meet in daily life (some of the little madams I have to work with would be prime candidates for a good caning), and it amused me to think of your readers setting down on paper exactly what they would like to do to them given unrestricted access. Now I’ve been rewarded by two splendid letters, one from J.S. in Blushes 22 setting out in minute detail how he would go about reducing ‘Miranda’ to a state of abject misery by denying her everything she most enjoys, and a second letter from P.A. of West London accompanied by photographs of his big-bottomed ‘Jennifer’. I would have liked fuller detail from P.A. about how he would deal with her, but he has actually bettered my original idea by suggesting that readers send in pictures of their adoptees. Then we can not only drool over the original fantasy, but use the girl for our own purposes! Imagine submitting a photo of your young secretary and being able a month later to read a clutch of caning fantasies about her from the Blushes readers! Like P.A., I would ask J.S. to let us see his Miranda if possible. As for Jennifer, with a bum like that she would hardly know where she was if I had charge of her! My God, what wouldn’t I give to spend an evening laying into those luscious cheeks with three feet of quality rattan! I will send you a report on my own adoptee in the near future, but I am at present trying to get hold of a photograph.

Question 11: Confidential advice on contraceptives should not be available to women under 30. At any age up to that they would have to be accompanied by a male over 21 who would have the right to decide what method was best for them. This should stop girls from fooling around with callow youths.

Question12: I totally agree with Roger S that a combination of tight and uncomfortable gym pants, with humiliatingly brief and ‘pretty’ party dresses for special occasions, is absolutely ideal. When not gainfully employed at some Further Education establishment or in a job, a girl’s time should be divided between housework, punishment, ballet or gymnastics and sleep.

Question 13: Celebrities for punishment — for sprinter Heather Oakes a thorough beating with a thin and whippy school cane on her bare brown bottom, followed by light flicks of the cane on the backs of her thighs.

Heather Oakes

Breakfast Time girl Debbie Greenwood should be sent away to an institution in which stringent physical methods will be used to rid her of her accent. I would also insist that her hair be cropped to mere stubble.

Debbie Greenwood

For the ghastly Floella Benjamin a draconian birching in front of her keenest enemies. Monaco’s princesses Caroline and Stephanie to be flogged with a hide whip in the public square.

Princesses Caroline & Stephanie

Actress Lesley Dunlop for a session nude in a pony cart, the riding crop to be used liberally across her fat bottom.

Leslie Dunlop

The BBC’s newest presenter of nature programmes, Peaches Golding, to be caned on the thighs and bottom by two gentlemen while she does her best to read an autocue. Dynamic Tina Turner must also come in for some thigh caning in addition to lashings of the martinet across her rump. Finally, TV presenter Sue Cook for caning and ‘tit dipping’ as described by one of your readers.

Sue Cook

Finally, I must in fairness answer the specific questions put to me by Roger S of Hounslow. Masturbation should not be allowed in single or married girls of any age. It is probably best prevented by putting a girl’s hands in mittens before she goes to bed. Personally I like a girl to have pubic hair, but if it is preferred otherwise it is not her word that should count. Shaving can be carried out by any interested male party. Bathing should be supervised and anyone who cares to may watch.

I would like to close for now — another letter will follow — by thanking you for printing my original questionnaire on the same spread as a photo of hapless typist Carol’s bare bottom. What a super bare arse, and how distressed she would be if she knew it had stimulated the marvellous letters in response to my questions. Now, gentlemen, let’s hear from you about your adopted girls, with photos wherever possible. Let me repeat Question 10: Choose any attractive girl of your acquaintance and imagine that you are granted custody over her without fear of interference from social workers or other do-gooders. How would you approach the prospect of disciplining her?’

Come along, gentlemen. Harden your hearts. They deserve it!

P.L. of the Questionnaire