Moments in C.P. History - Number 9: Father Cornelius Hadrian
Ninth part of the series by Paul Melrose, from Februs 40
Cornelius Hadrian was born in Brussels in 1518, effectively an only child, though his mother had given birth to a still-born infant earlier. He was brought up in a well-to-do, caring and religiously devout family whose most earnest wish was to see their son pass his theological examinations and enter the priesthood, which he succeeded in doing after hard work and application, not being the most naturally gifted of students.
He spent some time teaching in a church school and was, by
all accounts, industrious rather than inspirational and it was not long before
he realised his calling lay in more internal Church work. He applied through
his diocese for an assignment to a monastic order and was duly appointed to a
monastery in Brussels teaching theology where his plodding manner was not so
much of a handicap.
Cornelius appears to have been a success in this role
which he undertook for five years when, at the age of 30 he was appointed as
spiritual mentor to the Convent of the Little Sisters in Bruges in 1548. This
was a marked step up the ladder for Cornelius for, in such a convent where he
was the only male authority figure, his word was law, his standing in the
convent hierarchy above even that of the Mother Superior. By understood
convention, however, the spiritual mentor did not interfere with the running of
the convent in any way but had overall responsibility for the spiritual
well-being of the nuns within its walls.
For the first six months of his tenure, he appears to have
applied himself to the role with legitimate and wholesome vigour, earning much
respect from the nuns and strengthening his individual position. Sometime
within that first year, Cornelius, who had always been a solitary man with no
experience of women, underwent an experience which was to change his life. On
two separate occasions and concerning two different girls, Cornelius was
approached by the Mother Superior with very serious concerns about the behaviour
of a young nun. Cornelius, along with the Mother Superior, counselled the
errant girl on each occasion and, prompted by the Mother Superior’s insistence
that suitable punishment should follow, it was agreed that Cornelius would
flagellate the offender in public view of the entire convent. As was the
custom, the girl was stripped to the waist and a scourge applied to her naked
back.
Although by Cornelius’ own account the punishments were
not overly severe, the humiliation of a half-naked girl displayed to all and
the administration of the whip appears to have fired desires in the priest
which were to lead to outrageous excesses.
Adjacent to the convent was a girls’ school which served
the daughters of the wealthy merchants of Bruges and which functioned as a
finishing school for older female pupils, virtually young women, who would
become distinguished ladies in the society of the time. The school was proud of
both its academic record and its commitment to teaching the Catholic faith,
visits both to church on Sundays and to regular confessional at the adjacent
convent being mandatory for all the girls. The pupils were indoctrinated with
the power of the church and an awed respect for their spiritual confessor who
they would visit, in the convent, to receive a blessing any any appropriate
penance. Cornelius soon realised, by the very nature of his position, how much
power he had over these girls and he soon determined to take advantage of it.
He was very careful in the way he devised his scheme, not
rushing his fences or allowing himself to fall prey to carnal temptation which
would have ruined the plan. Instead he counseled all the girls over a period of
time, chose the ones he considered to be the most desirable and vulnerable,
then proceeded to work on their innate sense of guilt. In modern legal
parlance, Cornelius was undoubtedly guilty of ‘grooming’. Soon he managed to
persuade most of the girls he had targeted that mere penances of prayer and
drudgery were not achieving the desired results and that more painful remedies
were necessary. These poor impressionable girls, many very upset by what they
now perceived to be their dreadful failings, were induced to virtually beg for
corporal punishment to expiate their sins.
Cornelius was so cunning that he even demanded that they
be certain that a whipping was what they needed then, on receiving affirmation,
would accompany the girl to her home. There he would confront the distressed
parents, the poor girl would break down and admit all her sins, and Cornelius
would obtain written consent from the parents to administer discipline in any
way he chose.
The trap having been laid and the bait taken, Cornelius
was free to do as he wished. The errant girls were taken to his home which
adjoined the convent, each girl having to report to him on a weekly basis. He
arranged his schedule in such a way that he had ‘wicked girls’ to punish every
day of the week. When the girl, nervous and ashamed, was ushered into Cornelius’
home she was ordered to strip completely. Too frightened and respectful of the
priest to refuse, she would do his bidding immediately. The girl would then be
ordered to bend over a stool whereupon Cornelius would administer a variable
number of strokes, either with a birch or a whip, to the girl’s naked bottom.
After the punishment, the girl would have to display her stripes for some time
before being allowed to dress and return home.
Unbelievably, this practice continued, unabated for ten
years during which time Cornelius later admitted, at his ecclesiastical
enquiry, to having whipped or birched over 500 young women, some on multiple
occasions. How long he would have continued to enjoy his abuse of power is
anybody’s guess but eventually, in 1558, the sexual desire which inevitably
accompanied the whippings finally proved his undoing, but even then his
unmasking was through accidental discovery, and not as the result of a victim’s
complaint.
It transpired that one student, who I believe to have been
named Marie-Ann Leveque (although accounts differ), a niece of the Mayor of
Bruges, was one of the penitents whose parents had agreed to regular
disciplinary visits and who were quite happy in the knowledge that their
daughter was receiving corporal correction at the hands of the priest. After
all it was for her own good… Marie-Ann had admitted so
herself. However one morning, the girl’s mother woke her sleeping daughter, who
had returned from a disciplinary visit to the priest the previous evening
unusually tearful and distressed, and pulled back the sheet.
She was somewhat shocked by the number and intensity of
red weals on her daughter’s bottom but even more concerned by what were
obviously spots of blood on the sheet. There being no obvious signs of broken
skin as a result of the punishment, the girl was questioned by her angry mother
and, under intense interrogation, Marie-Ann broke down. She said that when the
punishment was over, the priest had held her tightly while she remained bending
over then she felt something enter her ‘shameful place’. A doctor was called
who confirmed anal penetration and a shocked Leveque family began proceedings
against the priest.
At first a wall of silence was thrown around the
complaints by the Church but eventually, after great persistence by the girl’s
family and their influential civic contacts, an ecclesiastical enquiry was
opened into the conduct of Father Cornelius Hadrian.
Amazingly, the priest did little to defend himself,
virtually admitting every charge that was thrown at him, possibly because of
guarantees obtained in advance to avoid embarrassing the Catholic Church with a
protracted ecclesiastical ‘trial’. He was dismissed from his post as mentor to
the convent but on full pension and no criminal charges were ever brought
against him.
Comments
Post a Comment